Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pune Plant (Tata Motors)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Pune Plant (Tata Motors)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can't find much in the way of evidence this topic meets WP:GNG. Seems to receive almost no coverage in independent sources. Ajpolino (talk) 00:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Ajpolino (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ajpolino (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ajpolino (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - manufacturing plants are not inherently notable; there is no evidence of significant coverage to require an article Spiderone  10:23, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - A major facility of a major manufacturer certainly is notable, much like the Saint Louis Assembly or Windsor Assembly which wouldn't be considered for deletion. Significant coverage certainly does exis demonstrating passing WP:GNG. And these are just English language sources after only a few seconds of searching.  Most certainly much more Hindi and Marathi coverage exists. --Oakshade (talk) 04:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000  ( talk,  contribs ) 00:53, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Good find Oakshade! Not sure how I missed those. Per the refs Oakshade found, I think the plant likely meets GNG and I'd like to withdraw my AfD nom (though I'm not sure I can, per WP:WDAFD since someone else has supported deletion). But I think this AfD can be closed keep or withdraw. Thanks. Ajpolino (talk) 18:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete instead as I've been watching this and the listed links are simply company and business announcements, none of this suggests a convincing article of anything but a local plant, that's not significant enough for actual notability itself. SwisterTwister   talk  00:46, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

 References  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment – In addition to those presented above, below are some more sources. Perhaps more non-English sources are available. North America1000 06:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * "Tata Motors Union awaits Tata blessings on new wage settle agreement". The Economic Times.
 * "Lost faith in Cyrus Mistry's leadership: Tata Motors Pune union". The Economic Times.
 * "Tata Motors’ UK research connection". The Engineer.
 * "Tata Motors close Pune plant for 3 days". Mint.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:21, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOPAGE and WP:NOTINHERITED. The plant itself has not received significant coverage independent of the company. The sources confirm that the plant exists, not why it is notable. In addition the sources are dealing with routine news - closure of a plant, comments by the union. None of this explains any cultural or historical significance of the plant. Also, the article itself is a bunch of WP:OR and honestly, this is eligible for a TNT. On top the that, the title isn't very precise either. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- the article in its entirety is an unreferenced essay and is strongly promotional. This content belongs on the company's web site, not in an encyclopedia. The sources presented at this AfD are local or routine, so the notability is not there for a stand alone article to begin with. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.