Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pungle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Pungle

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I can't find evidence that this is a term in general use. It seems to be mainly associated with (and coined by) the one band, which does not have a Wikipedia article of its own. Contested prod. ... disco spinster   talk  00:47, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:MADEUP. References are all last.fm pages. Not at all acceptable sources. DarkAudit (talk) 01:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:NOT. Monterey Bay (talk) 05:01, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Cannot see any reliable evidence that this is a notable genre. Fails WP:NOTE.-- SabreBD  (talk)  06:35, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 20:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: A non-existent genre. For a discussion (sometimes absurd) of this non-genre, see Talk:Pungle. Cresix (talk) 00:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Great concept, but we really need some more notability in music.  In short, it has to come up from underground. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 04:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete –  S enator2029  (talk) 16:50, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Why? -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 01:31, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.