Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punial State


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Gilgit Agency. Preserve as a search term given it did exist; no desire to keep this article (non-admin closure) Aszx5000 (talk) 21:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Punial State

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No reliable sources I could found and the only source is a humorous travelogue called Report from Practically Nowhere which is generally not reliable. Vitaium (talk) 13:31, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Vitaium (talk) 13:31, 9 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. The only source cited is simply inadequate, and I couldn't find any other significant coverage in reliable sources either. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:16, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect: to Gilgit Agency, which it was a part of. This princely state did exist (alternatively spelled Puniyal) but there is such a dearth of sources that I'm not sure it can even surpass the bare-minimum of WP:NOPAGE. Curbon7 (talk) 17:40, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Curbon7. -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 02:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.