Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punjab University Law College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm (talk) 17:25, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Punjab University Law College

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article isn't talking about the college but about listing of people purported to be from the college. A similar list is located in here: Category:Punjab University Law College alumni. At present, there is no notability claim about the college; a list of famous people from there does not show the college's notability. Thank you. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   16:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and India.  &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   16:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Education can be understood but why "India" there are many Indian Alumni of this particular institute and I've also added citations Dawood Ch 471 (talk) 02:36, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


 * What could I do to prevent it from deletion? It was created Specifically as an Alumni page but I can make it a descriptional page of that college if that would prevent it from deletion. Dawood Ch 471 (talk) 02:35, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, it can. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   15:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. I've stubified the article and I'm confident that more sources can be developed beyond the few I've used. Jahaza (talk) 21:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep:
 * - The article now has some sources. Though needs improvement.
 * - @ &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact) , can you confirm you followed WP:BEFORE and did search for potential sources and failed to find any.
 * - Note as per WP:N: "Editors evaluating notability should consider not only any sources currently named in an article, but also the possibility or existence of notability-indicating sources that are not currently named in the article. Thus, before proposing or nominating an article for deletion, or offering an opinion based on notability in a deletion discussion, editors are strongly encouraged to attempt to find sources for the subject in question and consider the possibility that sources may still exist even if their search failed to uncover any."
 * - I would find it very odd that there are not many adequate sources for the law school that seems to have produced the most prominant lawyers in a country. Jagmanst (talk) 04:48, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article certainly needs rewriting and trimming, but the topic is notable per WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:36, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Need some formating but Notable.--Ameen Akbar (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Keep this article. I don't understand Why nominate this article for deletion?--Fahads1982 (talk) 10:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.