Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punjab Urdu Academy, India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per the discussion, most likely run-of-the-mill coverage/insufficient independent reliable sources to demonstrate notability. The SandDoctor Talk 23:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Punjab Urdu Academy, India

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The lead says the institute was started in 1972 but the only citation in the article, the academy's website, says that the academy was established in 2005 and not much was done after that. This says the Academy was not even recognised by the government of Punjab as an education institution as late as 2013 and "failed to get wider acceptance in the absence of recognition". Its present status is not clear. I propose the article be deleted for not qualifying WP:Notability. Ankit2 (talk) 12:36, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 15:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 15:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 15:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Hanging on the edge of being passing Wikipedia notability requirements for me with a few reliable sources that could be found (albeit quite hidden). and  which talk about the Academy. However the articles official website's "about" section conflicts with the sources. What makes my vote a delete is the quality of the article, it does not cite any reliable sources, some of the information is incorrect such as the established date (compared to the reference) and it only cites one source.  Araratic  &#124;  talk  04:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete-I could find only two reliable sources mentioning this "Academy"(both are linked above)....However the two sources do not represent the quality of reporting expected from these sources. The articles are at the best WP:MILL coverage... accidental coverage when the main intention was to cover the minister's comment...Thus none of the sources confer notability to the subject — FR&thinsp;+ 11:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.