Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punjabi International Film Festival


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Punjabi International Film Festival

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. No major press coverage since 2012. Rushtheeditor (talk) 16:43, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 November 10.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 23:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG, per nominator, and while skimming through the article, the sources only state about the first annual Film Festival. Sarrail (talk) 23:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Events,  and Canada.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:25, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Film festivals don't automatically get "inherent" notability freebies just because they exist, and have to be shown to clear WP:GNG on their sourcing — but the referencing here isn't adequate, and I can't find anything else that would bolster the case: even on a ProQuest search, I still only get community hyperlocals within Peel Region, glancing namechecks of its existence in coverage of other things that are irrelevant to the notability of the festival (e.g. Tim Hudak staging a photo-op there during the 2014 election), and very brief blurbs in event listings that aren't notability builders. Bearcat (talk) 17:27, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Coverage merely confirms it happens, nothing indepth. Fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 22:10, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Checked again to see if any chance of being salvageable but came to same conclusion as of User:Bearcat, No significant coverage . &#32;Bookku   (talk) 10:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.