Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punk Radio Cast


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 23:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Punk Radio Cast
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NORG. I can find a lot of links on social media and streaming sites but only one article with a couple of lines of text in WP:RS.
 * J bh Talk  23:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  23:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  23:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  23:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  23:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  23:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as I found nothing better. Pinging interested subject users, , and .  SwisterTwister   talk  06:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 *  Reluctant Delete  GNG There's Spelglädje som firar 10 år i kväll. Again (looks like) a one-line coverage? "This record has been played on Punk Radio Cast." All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC).


 * Need to search PunkRadioCast - brings a lot more hits. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:19, 3 November 2015 (UTC).


 * Up to a short para now.. here R.F. 2015-11-3Z19:23

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * On the fence for the moment. I'm definitely not loving the level of sourcing that's actually present here so far, but there are certainly notability claims being made here that would make for a valid keep if the sourcing were a bit better. ProQuest didn't help at all, but I wasn't really expecting that it would — this isn't a class of topic that mainstream daily newspapers would be likely to cover all that extensively. But the topic does seem to have the level of genre-specific prominence necessary — internet radio streams that actually succeed in getting wikinotable bands to perform live shows on the stream? internet radio streams that actually succeed in getting wikinotable bands to sign on to a branded compilation album? — that it's clearly something more than just your average non-notable internet stream. So music magazines, especially genre-specific ones, may very well come to its rescue nonetheless — I've already been able to add a fifth source just by searching Exclaim! alone. Sometime closer to November 9, I'll come back to reevaluate whether the sourcing has been improved enough — but at least in principle, the notability is there and it's just a question of referencing it better. Bearcat (talk) 22:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * This article was kept after the 2009 AFD, when references were added. Some have been removed as dead links just before the recent proposed deletion. I don't know if they are reliable sources but at least one is still online with a different URL (http://www.wired.com/2008/05/punk-rock-webca/, formerly blog.wired.com/music/2008/05/punk-rock-webca.html). Peter James (talk) 13:33, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:48, 10 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.