Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punk house


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep per WP:HEY. This has been listed since 9/26/11. Good rescue, folks. Bearian (talk) 20:47, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Punk house

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No references. Redirect to squatters? Fasttimes68 (talk) 04:03, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong keep Punk houses are a well known and documented phenomenon distinct from squatting, though the two certainly overlap sometimes. I've added a couple references. Clearly meets WP:GNG now; sources are reliable, independent and constitute significant coverage. Gobonobo  T C 08:56, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 23:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 23:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * keep&mdash;this: puts it easily within WP:GNG.  There are also many articles on gnews that discuss the concept, many of which are now cited in the article.  the article is not in perfect shape, but the notability of the punk house as a concept seems to me to be unassailable.&mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 02:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Reliable sources establish notability for the topic:, , , and . Northamerica1000 (talk) 10:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Amble coverage found. Please follow WP:BEFORE and at the very least spend a few seconds checking the Google news archive.  The very first entry is from the New York Times and gives ample coverage to what you will find in a punk house.   D r e a m Focus  10:55, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.