Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punkas (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:14, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Punkas
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A seemingly non-notable website. The only real coverage it has in reliable sources is a few brief mentions that a member of its forums was arrested for harassing/threatening Yulia (singer), which really is not coverage of the site itself. Aside from that, I could not find any substantial coverage on the site. It was nominated for an AFD way back in 2005, and Kept, which is a bit baffling today, as the article was even worse shape back then, and was nothing more than a advertisement. Even without that problem, however, it fails the WP:GNG. Rorshacma (talk) 23:15, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 23:15, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 23:15, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:WEB, the only source isn't mainly about the website it just happens to mention it.  Hintswen   Talk |  Contribs   05:50, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - After reading 's vote I was surprised that she said that the article was even worse shape back during the first AFD. Considering the current state of the article -- only 2 sentences and no in-text citations -- I had a hard time imagining how it could ever have been worse. I found the revision just after the AFD was closed and it was this:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Punkas&oldid=14672584
 * How did anyone look at that and conclude that it was in excellent shape? Unsurpassingly, all of that 'great content' has to be subsequently removed (all but 2 sentences) Michepman (talk) 03:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 23:01, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - zero claim to notability. Bearian (talk) 18:49, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete After doing a search and looking at the article, it appears to fail GNG. Taewangkorea (talk) 19:55, 24 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.