Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punktuation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 13:19, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Punktuation

 * Also nominated:
 * Dan Revel
 * Ryan Cowie
 * Tim Shotter
 * Rick Thompson
 * Sue Hipperson
 * Delete all: Questionable adherence to WP:BAND. No mentions on either allmusic.com or amazon.com and little mention elsewhere.  Creator asserts that the band released two CDs but only locally (see Talk:Punktuation). —Wknight94 (talk) 23:59, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete all, nn-band. --King of All the Franks 00:08, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 00:49, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete All I don't think I've ever heard a stupider band name. Kenneth Nishimoto 00:54, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all as non-notable musical group and non-notable biography. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-20 10:50Z 
 * Delete all per Quarl. --Terence Ong 13:41, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Punkmorten 15:49, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Then do it. I have to say im dissapointed with wikipedia, not very open source if you have to be a megastar to get on it, and as for the personal insult from Kenneth, what have you achieved exactly? You know nothing about local music clearly and need to open your eyes a bit. If you have any guts you will apologise for what is an unnecessary comment. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ryanlufbra (talk &bull; contribs).
 * We're a free encyclopedia and a wiki first. We have standards for inclusion, just like all other encyclopedias. Being released under a free licence and WP:NOT being paper doesn't mean we'll let any old thing in. Johnleemk | Talk 13:19, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.