Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punta Gorda Middle School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep, per improvements to the article during AFD. Davewild (talk) 11:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Punta Gorda Middle School

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Middle schools don't get a free pass (HS do) and there is no assertion of notability. Was declined speedy (?) so we go here. Pharmboy (talk) 01:33, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I removed the speedy deletion tag, because I know that most school article deletions are controversial, and many become improved to the point of concensus for keep during an AfD. I am choosing not to !vote on this one at this time. JERRY talk contribs 02:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions.   —JERRY talk contribs 02:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no assertion of notability. Just a garden-variety middle school by the looks of it.  Lankiveil (talk) 04:43, 23 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Merge and redirect to Punta Gorda, Florida until we have an article for Charlotte County Public Schools. (jarbarf) (talk) 05:40, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per comments by (jarbarf). Mh29255 (talk) 07:55, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It has references and notability; I don't think that theres any reason for it to be deleted.  Noah¢s   ( Talk )  03:57, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per above discussions and precedent. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, thanks to DoubleBlue this page now contains the necessary independent, verifiable sources to meet WP:N and contains several specific claims of notability. TerriersFan (talk) 17:52, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Article as it currently stands after improvement, provides the required reliable and verifiable sources to satisfy the Notability standard. Alansohn (talk) 17:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:N, kudos again to DoubleBlue. Noroton (talk) 20:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep well sourced and just notable enough imo. RMHED (talk) 16:53, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.