Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punyabhushan Awards (2009%u20132018)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Three relistings, nothing even resembling a consensus, or even a discussion, really. Feel free to renominate in a couple weeks Courcelles 00:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Punyabhushan Awards (2009–2018)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contest PROD. Concern was: Not enough here to determine notability nor even what the award is about and no independent sources. Eeekster (talk) 08:28, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 4.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  08:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. A3 no content whatsoever. Possibly a conflict edit, deleted and sent to AFD simultaneously? Cindy  ( talk to me ) 08:56, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I have taken the liberty of striking Cindy's comment. I believe this relates to a false start on the article at Punyabhushan Awards (2009%u20132018) which did qualify for speedy deletion. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:53, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The Snotbot seems to have re-added AfD template to the Punyabhushan Awards (2009–2018) after I had removed it post updating the article. Is there something else I need to do to stop this from happening again? --MK 15:18, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Why did you remove it? Eeekster (talk) 21:21, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Taken from the template that was added - You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. That's why. Please also see the talk page of the article. --MK 14:44, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  talk to me! 10:10, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 14:58, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 03:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Superficially, there are reliable sources in the article, and I do not see any reasons why it should be deleted, so keep.--Ymblanter (talk) 01:40, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.