Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puppetz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete (A7). King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 20:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Puppetz

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable online persona. Non encyclopedic. ← Spidern  →  16:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   --  ←  Spidern  →  16:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Utterly non-notable. And what on earth is "fretting" anyway? &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * See . ←  Spidern  →  19:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

This is way too complicated for me to reply with all this code, but my argument is that, since there's a Frets on Fire page, there should be an article to the best fretter in the community to referer to. Just because you don't know what "fretting" is, doesn't mean it should be deleted. I am, again, sorry for not knowing how to code this properly - THEHighFlyer15
 * Speedy delete notability not asserted. JuJube (talk) 22:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 *  delete no reliable sources. - 7-bubёn >t 23:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: db-bio. Schuym1 (talk) 00:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Completely non-notable. Too bad tagging it with speedy delete would probably be met with decline. Leave  Sleaves  19:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.