Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purchase-to-pay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ATD is policy. TNT isn't. (non-admin closure) Andrew🐉(talk) 09:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Purchase-to-pay

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Old article, without any reliable source, and written mostly by two companies. I did a recent trim of the article, so you might want to check the previous version for the removed text and the two non-reliable sources that were present. I think WP:TNT really applies here. MarioGom (talk) 18:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 18:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Though the nominator has already improved the article, per WP:ATD-E, deletion should be avoided as p2p is a well known mode of operation. Chiro725 (talk) 00:51, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:04, 29 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 07:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.