Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure + simple


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Closing this par WP:SNOW. No claim to notability, Purely promotional and a CoI editor. I see no reason to keep this listed for another 7 days. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 21:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Pure + simple

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I have declined this speedy deletion, as I feel the article may possibly have some merit - it's not blatant advertising. However, I'm not sure if it passes notability requirements set out at WP:N. The creator seems happy to work with people to make the article better. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 20:11, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not a shred of notability even claimed, let alone proved. Pure sales talk. And given the article creator's name is, the chances of their being around to help -- since they're going to be blocked at WP:UAA Real Soon Now -- is about nil. --Calton | Talk 20:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as spamvertisment by COI editor. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:57, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I can find nothing about them except their own website, clearly not notable enough for an article yet.  Teapot  george Talk  21:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.