Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure Jatomi Fitness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar ♔  17:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Pure Jatomi Fitness

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to pass Notability (companies). Some coverage in low-key, niche sources. Awards that are similarly niche and haven't generated any significant coverage. In other words - advertisement spam. Wikipedia is not Yellow Pages. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:43, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 21 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Olaf Davis (talk) 23:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep - as meeting WP:CORPDEPTH per coverage in mainstream (non-niche) publications, such as The Star and Yahoo News. It is also likely that additional Polish-language news sources cover this company. NorthAmerica1000 05:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 17:07, 5 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: Apparently the person who originally created the article was a sock of User:Elandroid. No thoughts on notability, but figured I should probably make any incoming editors aware of this factor. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:46, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.