Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purple Line (Namma Metro)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Namma Metro.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 04:55, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Purple Line (Namma Metro)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

A directory entry (WP:WINAD) sourced form one random website of unknown reliability that doesn't actually use the name "purple line" as far as I can tell. Guy (Help!) 07:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Sister Green Line (Namma Metro) must be discussed here, in one package. May I also point at the existence of Template:BMR Green Line. NVO (talk) 19:47, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete both Green and Purple lines. BMRC itself calls the line The East-West corridor . It is not operational yet (thus no established popular name). There are plenty of independent sources on the system itself (like Jane's which uses BMRC naming convention). Both Purple and Green articles may be deleted for now, they add nothing to info in Namma Metro. P.S. Reliability of data collected by Robert Schwandl may be discussed separately; but in this case there's nothing to discuss: he simply reproduced the BMRC statement. Assuming good faith, I regard your view of Rob as "unknown" and "random" as a belated April 1 joke. NVO (talk) 19:27, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Namma Metro until some evidence of the actual lines are available. DanTD (talk) 19:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect until a firm naming convention for the lines is established. This applies to Purple Line (Namma Metro), Green Line (Namma Metro) and the already linked to in the article Line 1, Bangalore Metro redundancy, which violates every disambiguation rule in its title.oknazevad (talk) 01:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not participating in the debate earlier. Here is a reference where the BMRCL MD N Sivasailam talks about names of the two lines in the INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS section. A link to the webpage one of the contractor for the UG section of NM. --Johnxxx9 (talk) 05:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.