Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purple Turtle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 05:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Purple Turtle

 * – ( View AfD View log )

If this is the most that can be said about this "organization" after seven years of an article being up (and three years of being tagged for primary sources), then it doesn't seem that there's enough "there" there to support a claim of encyclopedic notability. bd2412 T 04:27, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. Note that if this article is deleted, Purple Turtle (disambiguation) will be eligible for speedy deletion as a disambig page that does not disambiguate anything (the only other link on that page is a red link for a club mentioned in this article). Cheers! bd2412  T 04:29, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete—unsourced burning-cruft. Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 16:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I see nothing at all that even comes close to passing WP:ORG. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:10, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No coverage found in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:ORG.  Gongshow  Talk 23:52, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.