Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purple dwarf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 01:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Purple dwarf
From google, I don't believe this is an established category of star. Might be an established type of lily however. Kappa
 * Delete nonsense as written, and the lily seems to be just an individual variety, not a species, and not particualrly notable -- if it is, this article will in no way help write about the lily anyway. DES (talk) 20:55, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete there is no such thing as a purple dwarf star.--Adam [[Image:Flag of the United States.svg|25px| ]](talk) 21:03, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. A Pink elephant on the other hand... PJM 21:05, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Or if Rimmer adds blue paint to the Red Dwarf.Obina 22:17, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The only purple dwarf I can find is the plant as well. Delete to prevent Green Dwarfs which we cannot see. Dr Debug (Talk) 22:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Um it looks like we might be too late to prevent Green dwarfs, but luckily there's a book. Kappa 22:35, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as patent nonsense. Georgewilliamherbert 03:12, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Latinus (talk (el:)) 17:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

I've deleted it- patent nonsense. Markyour words 22:38, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The deletion is not supposed to happen until the debate is finished. 64.194.44.220 03:29, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * This debate is finished. It's Deceased.  It's passed beyond the Event horizon.  It's pushing up Daisys.
 * This is an Ex-Debate.
 * Georgewilliamherbert 03:38, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, seems like a bit of rubbish. The article was speedy deleted by Markalexander100 as patent nonsense, although appears to have since been recreated. I don't think it meets the speedy criteria on this revision. Stifle 00:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, if we must go through the charade. Markyour words 11:41, 5 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.