Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purple minutes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:43, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Purple minutes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. Since it was prodded (by User:The Anome) and deprodded before (by the creator User:Diverman who wrote way back in 2007: "this article was created as part of the WP:HOT project. i.e. there was a request to create it". Well, 10 years down the road it still looks like it did back them, this is I am sorry to say like a spammy neologism that fails GNG. I couldn't find any sources that woudl convince me otherwise, I am afraid. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:13, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as essentially speedy material and there's nothing at all for substance and notability whatsoever so that seems to be the honesty, enough time passed also for any sufficient improvements but none happened. SwisterTwister   talk  05:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- A7 material and no value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The article was created in good faith, but this seems to be a neologism that never gained currency in independent sources. Without independent RS, even a merge or redirect wouldn't be justified. Hence, delete. --Mark viking (talk) 20:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.