Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purplera1n


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep as per consensus. Non-admin closure for both AfDs. Warrah (talk) 01:17, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Purplera1n

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. Hackware with no assertion of notability; only reference is a blog. Also, reads like an instruction manual.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 23:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Also nominating:
 * Keep Purplera1n per, , , , and . Joe Chill (talk) 00:25, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep the second article also per, , , , and . Joe Chill (talk) 00:31, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep both per sources found by Joe Chill, which include CNet, Wired (magazine), Techtree, etc. Pcap ping  08:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep great job Joe Chill. I will make an effort sometime to make the articles more suitable for an encyclopedia.   TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 23:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep both per the sheer number of high level references. Justin Ormont (talk) 22:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep references are enough and notable enough publications. MrMacMan  Talk  05:11, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Can an admin close this? It's clear that this article will be kept. Girafe53 (talk) 22:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.