Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purplle.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to lack notability. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 02:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Purplle.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, fails WP:CORP - raising finance is not notable. ukexpat (talk) 20:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, also article created by WP:SPA, but no declaration of WP:COI Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable, extremely poor references. This one comes from "a platform where you can tell the story of your brands" and is written in the first person: "Attend our online workshops on beauty", "At Purplle we strongly believe", etc. IMO it's clear that the creator Ubercontent has a conflict of interest — look at this promotional interview "Purplle.com: A Beautiful Partnership in Beauty Products and Services", (offered as a reference), written by in fact the byline "Uber Content". The user has asked a question on the Village Pump and has edited their talkpage, but has not edited after being advised in both places about our sourcing and COI principles. Note: Twinkle sent the AfD alert to User:Usamshab, the creator of the original article which was deleted in October 2015, so I have copied it to Ubercontent's page. I hope they'll see it and weigh in here. Bishonen &#124; talk 09:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP Theroadislong (talk) 13:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails all tests of notability. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  04:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.