Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purpose (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Purpose (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found only newspaper listings at Newspapers.com and newspaper listings are insufficient to fully establish notability per NFSOURCES. I found no sources or reviews reliable or suitable enough to pass WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 16:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 16:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: I kind of get the impression that there's probably more out there coverage-wise, but I couldn't really find much other than what I added to the article. I think a good compromise would be to merge some of the content to the article for Ronnie Apteker, as this film was pretty much his baby and sort of his first foray into film production as far as I can tell. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  This AfD discussion includes a proposal for merger to Ronnie Apteker,,, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and a notice of the proposed merger was posted to on June 22. As such, this AfD discussion may need to be extended or relisted to incorporate input from.


 * Keep - I'd say passes WP:GNG with sources added into article now. Other source found inBusiness Day (South Africa), and . WikiVirusC (talk) 18:38, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as has reliable sources reviews in South African newspapers such as The Mail and Guardian (in the article) and the above mentioned Business Day and Sunday Times so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:27, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I withdraw this nomination per consensus. The Film Creator (talk) 13:48, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.