Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pursuit of the Truth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Daniel (talk) 10:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Pursuit of the Truth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unsourced article about an "upcoming" web series, making no claim of notability that would satisfy either WP:NMEDIA or WP:WEB. While it does have an IMDb page which confirms that it aired in 2013, the mere existence of an IMDb profile is not a notability freebie in and of itself — I did both general web and news searches on Google, as well, but found nothing like the volume of media coverage it would take to make this something that Wikipedia should have an article about (especially not one that's so poorly maintained that it still describes a two-year-old series as "upcoming"). Per WP:NOTINHERITED, further, the fact that a couple of people who were already notable for other things were involved in it does not, in and of itself, constitute a notability freebie either, if the series isn't itself the subject of any media coverage in its own right. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 17:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC)


 * While I don't want to preclude it from having its own article for the future if it does become notable, these concerns aren't great enough to let crystal-balling be a thing, so Delete. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 20:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete If the show is notable when it releases I think it could make a fine article, as it currently is? I think we can delete it for now. Bryce Carmony (talk) 13:02, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.