Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pushpaka Aviation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn by nominator without opposition. The Bushranger One ping only 03:12, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Pushpaka Aviation

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Seems like advertising to me. Nothing to signify it meets WP:Notability. Does not seem to hold any muster to large aviation organizations such as Delta, Southwest etc. Also no peer reviewed information which would indicate importance. Keystoner idin (speak) 20:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. If you are going to have a complete history of aviation in India, you can't delete this company, which has been around for decades. It's routinely referred to in the media regarding helicopter operations at Juhu Airport, e.g. . Furthermore, it's bad form to do a RFD for an article after only one edit has been made to it. WP:CHANCE Edward Vielmetti (talk) 21:30, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment No matter how many times I look at the history of this article, I still get that it was nominated for deletion 2 minutes and 35 seconds after its creation.  Unscintillating (talk) 01:05, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Don't bite a new article here 2 minutes after its creation. This doesn't seem right. Let the article's creator add more sources to it and expand it. Maybe it will be notable or maybe not and it will be deleted but who can judge in just 2 minutes. --Artene50 (talk) 01:47, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Nominator Withdraw May have rushed this one a bit too quick. Keystoner  idin (speak) 02:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.