Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pushpanagar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Pushpanagar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable enough. »  nafSadh did say 09:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Places are generally notable. WP:NPLACE states that "Cities and villages are generally kept, regardless of size, as long as their existence is verified through a reliable source." Articles for deletion/Common outcomes is not a policy or guidelne itself, but does provide a useful summary of how AfDs have been decided over the years. Emeraude (talk) 11:24, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Pushpanagar village certainly exists. It's in the Kolhapur district of Maharashtra state, with a correct citation to onefivenine.com mapping website. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:05, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: It's a verified village. SL93 (talk) 01:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.