Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pussy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snowball keep / withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure). ~Super Hamster  Talk Contribs 22:38, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Pussy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Neither fish nor fowl nor good red meat, the only thing that seems to hold this page together are the letters in the word. Dougweller (talk) 15:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, no valid reason for deletion given. It's clearly an encyclopedia article about a word, not a mere dicdef. Could use more sources and some cleanup, but that's not what RFD is for. Aɴɢʀ (talk) 17:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Aɴɢʀ (talk) 17:49, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Aɴɢʀ (talk) 17:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, Apart from its offensive name, the article was really informative. OccultZone (talk) 18:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Though it is offensive, crude, or tough to read with my family around, the page deserves to keep. Like OccultZone stated, "the article was really informative" and well referenced. I don't understand the explanation as to why this page was PRODed. Seems like the initial reaction to reading the page is to get rid of it however, that reason does not suffice. Meatsgains (talk) 19:08, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and close. No rationale provided by the nominator.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 20:20, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, no rationale for deletion (I'd NAC it myself, but I'm not on my main account and would rather not) Luke no 52  (tell Luke off here) (legitimate alternate account of Lukeno94) 20:28, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Not as common in American as in British English, but a good article. For "proper" use citations, M. Gandhi -- A helpless mouse is not non-violent because he is always eaten by pussy. He would gladly eat the murderess if he could, but he ever tries to flee from her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OtterSmith (talk • contribs)


 * Withdraw nomination - ok, my take is clearly wrong, so I'm withdrawing this. Sorry about that. Dougweller (talk) 21:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.