Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pustule dome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KaisaL (talk) 23:59, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Pustule dome

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This seems to be a term for a specific feature on a specific trail in the grand canyon. Despite the claim that is has been widely accepted by academics, there were no Google Scholar uses of the term in relation to geology, and the only other sources I could find for its use as a general term were either Wikipedia mirrors from the old version of this article that was deleted in 2008 or books from University of Northampton (where the term was coined). Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 21:56, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is an article about a not notabile neologism that has little or no usage in reliable sources. - Pmedema (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. This appears to be a neologism that never gained widespread use, as the lack of sources available upon searches demonstrates.  64.183.45.226 (talk) 22:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.