Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puthir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Tawker (talk) 22:36, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Puthir

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFILM. Prod declined without comment. No sources found. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:42, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  21:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as not notable, failing WP:FILM--DThomsen8 (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:43, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, we see the same phenomenon almost everyday, with Indian (particularily South Indian) movie productions being routinely discarded as non-notable. There are several notable figures involved in the making of the movie, seem notable enough. --Soman (talk) 06:44, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTINHERITED. Just because the people involved are notable doesn't mean the work itself is. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 13:15, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Now that this article has been improved in several respects, I am changing to say keep this article.--DThomsen8 (talk) 15:11, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.