Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PxSpot (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Singu larity  07:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

PxSpot
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This page looks like spam; content does not seem to meet Wikipedia standards. It contains numerous typos and even shows another photo sharing site "Zooomr" in the Infobox (cut and paste?)Photoact (talk) 09:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

I have added additional references to this service to meet the needs of noteworthyness. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pistolhip2 (talk • contribs) 18:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable; no secondary source coverage. Most Google hits are press releases (aside from other primary sources) and only one brief mention in a Google News hit. — 97198   talk  09:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   —Photoact (talk) 09:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I agree with 97198 above and couldn't say it better myself; I'm just adding to the consensus.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:10, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: this page was SPEEDY DELETED twice before Tutankabron (talk) 16:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as I find no verifiabile, reliable sourcing, no assertion of notability. We must remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and this appears to too indiscrimnate for inclusion. I would also like recommend WP:SALT given the tenacity of the subject's creator.  Dloh  cierekim  22:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * DO NOT DELETE I have found this service to be very useful and it is a legitimate business that deserves representation on the wikipedia. They are working with large radio stations and syndicated shows such as Ace & TJ. (http://www.acetj.com/photos/. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pistolhip2 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

I use this service and I think it's great. It should not be deleted. --Chad M. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.198.133.72 (talk) 18:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.