Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PyTorch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ansh 666 07:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

PyTorch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested Prod - no indication of notability - primarily an advertisement for a new product PRehse (talk) 12:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 12:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 12:09, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: I added a couple of references (InfoWorld, O'Reilly) to the article. PyTorch is also discussed on page 2 of this interview. Although these are fairly strong, however, it is debatable whether it is WP:TOOSOON to sustain an article. AllyD (talk) 16:48, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Leaning to keep. It's adequately covered in the tech press, with a smattering of more scholarly publications (the bulk of which, however, appear to be on sites like the arXiv and have not yet meandered all the way through peer review). So, it may be a bit soon, but given the people backing it, it seems likely to be around for a while. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 20:16, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep in light of the new references. &mdash; cnzx  21:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.