Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pycsw


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Geospatial metadata. Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Pycsw

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Pretty small open source project - its Github repo has less than 200 stars. I'm not seeing the coverage needed to justify GNG.

https://github.com/geopython/pycsw BrigadierG (talk) 01:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing, Internet,  and Software. BrigadierG (talk) 01:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Several possible outcomes are mentioned here and we need a consensus for one in order to close this discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:02, 9 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect, possibly selective merge, to Geospatial_metadata where it is mentioned. Because it is an Open Geospatial Consortium reference implementation project, redirecting to Open_Source_Geospatial_Foundation, where it is mentioned, would also be a possibility. Basic facts are verifiable in RS, e.g.,, and it is a plausible search term. Hence a redirect that places it in context and perhaps a brief merge of verifiable facts is a reasonable and preferable alternative to deletion per our policies WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE. -- 18:05, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * That article is looking rather too WP:NOTDIRECTORY/WP:COATRACK already for my liking. Probably due a cleanup. BrigadierG (talk) 21:10, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.