Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyerite


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 00:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Pyerite

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I thought it was edging it when people started making articles for each of the races of EVE Online, but now we're seeing the beginning of a series of articles about individual minerals in EVE Online. This is absurd, and makes a joke out of notability and verifiability, but most of all they're filled with original research. Also included in this nomination is — Da rk •S hik ari [T] 05:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 05:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. I'm a little heasitant about calling someone else's information deletable when it's a phenomenon outside of my own pet interests, but I'm not feeling particularly more enlightened about EVE Online after reading this bit.  It MIGHT make a point or two in articles related to game currency or resources or things of that nature, but otherwise one might as well write 'Meat (Kingdom of Loathing)' to discuss the use of that game's currency.  And that's NOT a call to make that article! IL-Kuma 07:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete information better suited to the main article in summarised form and we don't really need to be kept informed of the fluctuation of virtual markets--The internet is serious business 10:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to Pyrite - reasonable misspelling. (Edited.) -- Charlene 14:21, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete (and move to EVE-Wiki) and/or merge to Economics of EVE-Online, minerals section (if such article is created). As for Tritanium, since it is indeed a name also used in Master of Orion, and Star Trek, I would 'week keep' if it was referenced.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 14:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete EVE doesn't need to take over the whole of Wikipedia. I don't believe there is enough independent references to even create Economics of EVE-Online, I wrote much of the economics section of EVE Online and there is nothing academic and little in the press about the economics, most useful references are interviews and red's dev blogs. -- Richard Slater ( Talk to me! ) 17:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.