Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyle MS

No schools, please. Delete. JFW | T@lk  01:16, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Schools please, IF notability can be proved. This article shows no notability. In this case, delete. WhisperToMe 02:13, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * This is a substub that I nearly pulled the trigger on for simply not being in any way possible. It's name + name means.  Delete.  Notable schools are like notable anything else.  This isn't one. Geogre 03:38, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: nonarticle, no evidence of notability. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:40, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Articles on schools need to be more than stubs to demonstrate notability. Average Earthman 09:02, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Notable schools like this one are acceptable. Keep. anthony (see warning) 15:38, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * If you or anyone else expands this article to more than a substub, then I may change my mind. One line doesn't cut it, and just wastes people's time in clicking on the link. Average Earthman 19:03, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * I generally don't expand articles which are about to be deleted. That's a waste of my time. If the article gets kept, then I may expand it. anthony (see warning) 20:10, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Oh, come on. A one-sentence substub by a child does not an article make.  The title isn't even useable.  Look, Anthony...if you can expand this article sufficiently and prove this school's notability, I'll change my vote.  Really, what does this article say about this place?  Right.  Nothing.  In the meantime, I vote a very emphatic delete of this little bit of nothing. - Lucky 6.9 06:46, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * I can expand this article sufficiently and prove its notability, and I'll do so as soon as the threat of having this work deleted is minimized. anthony (see warning) 16:33, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Sounds like an attempt at blackmail to me, Anthony. RickK 19:07, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Orphan, violates naming conventions, lacks sources for independent verification. Davodd 16:32, Sep 4, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm on record as being in favor of schools, but this substub is completely useless. Ambi 21:37, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, if not improved. Andris 21:39, Sep 4, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Agree with anthony.--Dittaeva 16:14, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, substub, bad title.  RickK 20:15, Sep 7, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete -Joseph 17:57, 2004 Sep 8 (UTC)
 * Comment: Why not leave this up for another week or two beyond the kill date so that it can be expanded?  If Anthony is willing to give it a go, this little bit of info isn't taking up a whole lot of server space.  Or better still, hit the Internet now and start in on fixing this.  A lot of articles have passed through this page, been improved and the nomination dropped. - Lucky 6.9 20:19, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  00:18, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)