Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyramid Party of India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There has been no policy-based input on why this article should be kept. Modussiccandi (talk) 08:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Pyramid Party of India

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Previously prodded in 2010. No notability asserted, only one source Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - coverage in mainstream media per https://www.vice.com/en/article/j57y7p/political-party-believes-meditation-and-vegetarianism-will-solve-indias-problems-elections, http://www.uniindia.net/pyramid-party-of-india-holds-silent-rally-in-delhi-pledges-go-vegan/india/news/1548951.html, note here https://www.facebook.com/pyramidspiritualsocietiesmovement/photos/a.294463297379382/1153957071429996/ , https://www.facebook.com/PyramidPartyOfIndia/photos/a.561216164369426/568368026987573/ material of mainstream media coverage not available online. Party got 130,362 votes in 2004 election (contesting 13 out of 543 seats). --Soman (talk) 13:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Response The appropriate guideline is NCORP. By itself, "coverage" is not sufficient to establish notability, rather the "content" of the references in question. The Vice reference takes all its information from the website and from quotes made by the leaders. There is very little "Independent Content" (ORGIND) and not enough to meet CORPDEPTH. The UNI India reference appears to be a copy of this Millennium Port article published a day earlier which fails CORPDEPTH and/or ORGIND. Facebook isn't a reliable source. I'm unable to locate any references that provides good in-depth details on the organization and which doesn't rely entirely on information provided by their website or organizers.  HighKing++ 11:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete User:力 (powera, π,  ν ) 17:59, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: My close as a functional PROD was challenged, so I have restored it for further discussion per policy. Policy-based input would be very helpful for the next closer. Thank you. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  16:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:06, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 16:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep They are noticeable. KhinMoTi (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 12:41, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. <b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>++ 11:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Since this is an organization, the appropriate guideline is WP:NCORP. As such we therefore require references that discuss the *organization* itself in detail. As per WP:SIRS *each* reference must meet the criteria for establishing notability - the quantity of coverage is irrelevant so long as we find a minimum of two. WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the organization* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". None of the references meet NCORP's criteria for establishing notability. Topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. <b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>++ 11:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG, lacking indepth sources. 05:29, 20 May 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LibStar (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.