Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyscho Killer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Anthony Appleyard (talk)

Pyscho Killer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing to indicate notability. Created by new WP:SPA. Possibly made up, no sources indicating that it exists. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 01:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The lack of evidence for it's existence is pretty damning, and I had been wondering why it had been so rapidly targeted for deletion. My instinct says delete, but I'd like to hear if the article creator has anything to say for themself, as they no longer seem to actually be a SPA. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 01:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect "Pyscho Killer" to Psycho Killer. Mewtwowimmer (talk) 16:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 *  Speedy delete  as a copyright violation of this site. (So tagged.) WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment On a positive note -- a simple search for <"Psycho Killer" video game> on Google shows sufficient results to verify that the game existed. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:32, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Change to keep. Copyright violation has been managed, and the game has received some coverage. It's 20 years out of publication, so finding online sources might be difficult, but archived print sources may prove useful. Note, if kept, the duplicate article at Psycho Killer (game) should be deleted to make way for a proper page move of this article to the proper spelling and disambiguation. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * , this !vote is based on presumption of sources rather than the existence of sources... czar  17:13, 24 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete both. Only extant review is in Amiga Joker, which is at least two major publication reviews short of significant coverage. Please ping me if you find other publications. Also this discussion should have been—at the very least—a textbook redirect to the existing page. In reality, what was salvaged from the copyvio? Should have been nuked, especially since it isn't sitting at a useful redirect title (a typo). czar  17:13, 24 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.