Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PythonIDE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 17:10, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

PythonIDE

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Ineligible for A7 since it's software, but still this doesn't appear to be notable. A search fails to find any reliable coverage; in fact, most hits I found are false positives. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:54, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

It is a new editor and there is an article on Habrahabr about it - http://habrahabr.ru/post/249727/. Google or other search engines you might use didn't add it to their indexes yet
 * That link doesn't go to an article. It goes to some page with a few hundred characters in the cyrillic alphabet. Also, that isn't how google works. The people at Google don't sit around deciding what and what not to add to their indexes. They have algorithms that update the indexes automatically. So if its not showing up on Google then that means there are no articles about it that are generating significant hits yet. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 13:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Delete: not notable. IDE is a generic term used in software to describe any development environment hence all the false positive for "Python IDE". I couldn't find any actual refs for this particular tool except their web site. It looks kind of cool from the site but not wp:notable yet. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 00:37, 5 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:51, 12 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 10:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC) Delete: Not notable yet. ☃ Unicodesnowman (talk) 12:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Delete Not notable per above. PianoDan (talk) 14:47, 20 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as per . ~KvnG 05:36, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.