Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pz10.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Pz10.com
The result was Speedy Delete per G7 – page blanked by main contributor. « Gonzo fan2007  (talk)  @  18:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable web site. No third-party sources to back up claims of members or traffic. Fails WP:WEB and WP:CORP. Original author has a conflict of interest as he is the owner of the website. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The lack of third-party reliable sources does it for me. There are some assertions that may make the article notable, but after my own search, there are just no reliable sources to verify these claims.  Even with these claims, it is hard to tell whether they are truly notable (being the first Indian-based website to break the top 4500 websites?, the No. 35 Indian web portal?, etc) The lack of sources, combined with it reading like an advert, and it failing WP:WEB and WP:CORP, means I endorse the deletion request.  « Gonzo fan2007   (talk)  @  05:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB. Even if we accept the really weak claims in the article as 100% truth, they're not notable in the slightest, though there is a certain charm in claiming to host "stomach-churning jokes".  Note that the article is also a pretty blatant advertisement that even slips into first-person at the end: "...we work continuously to keep up and bring in more creativity".  Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:18, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (G11) — Eligible for a Spammy award. MuZemike  ( talk ) 13:35, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Now eligible for speedy delete as WP:CSD with this edit. My edits to the article were not substantial, but would prefer that another admin close this AfD and delete the article since I was in contact with the original author regarding issues with the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 15:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.