Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QASSIM ABDALKAREEM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone who participated. Please keep all responses to closure civil. If you wish to contest the results, please visit deletion review. Missvain (talk) 23:55, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

QASSIM ABDALKAREEM

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As far as I can tell from Google caches (admins can probably confirm this) articles about the same guy have been speedy-deleted four times in the past under the title Qassim abdulkareem. I initially tagged this version with a BLPPROD tag but the author has now included six links. The problems is that four of them are in fact 404 errors. The remaining two are very short interviews in Arabic so I can't confirm that the guy interviewed is indeed QASSIM ABDALKAREEM but it's clear that they are not sufficiently detailed to form the basis of an article. The claim is that he plays for an Iraqi team (Al Nasr) but we don't currently have an article on the team and since Iraq currently doesn't have a fully professional league, he fails WP:NFOOTY. The article also makes extraordinary claims about his founding (at the tender age of 16) of a media company that now gets millions of view on YouTube. This is unsupported by references. Pichpich (talk) 19:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails relevant notability criteria -- samtar talk or stalk 20:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: No evidence that this is a notable soccer player. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Of the four external links on the page, two are broken links. The two that work are interviews with someone named Hattan Qassim, presumably a different person than this. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 10:58, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.