Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QAliber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  → Call me  Hahc  21  01:50, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

QAliber

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced and I can't find any material to support WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:29, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: The Test and Try "first look" review linked in the article is the most substantial coverage that I can see, and is not enough to demonstrate that the product ever attained notability. AllyD (talk) 08:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - software article of unclear notability. The test&try link is a blog and not sufficient to establish notability. A search did not reveal any RS coverage (except for a printer with the same name). Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 14:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm unable to find evidence that this meets WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT.  Gong   show  00:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.