Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QED National


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

QED National

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non notable company, fails WP:CORP –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:48, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  -- –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:49, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:50, 29 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - insufficient coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate notability per WP:CORP. ukexpat (talk) 00:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Fails WP:CORP and meets or exceeds WP:COI. moreno oso (talk) 00:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ukexpat, most if not all of the GNews hits were press releases.  GregJackP   Boomer!   00:35, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom  GoPurple  'n  Gold24   06:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yet another IT spammer: certified Women-Owned Business Enterprise which provides IT services.... - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:39, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - lacks the coverage needed to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 18:43, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. per WP:CORP. Of the 21 links to so called sources, most  of them  are to  Wikipedia pages, others are to directories or other trade organisations; none are actually  about QED National in  a way  that  asserts its notability. The reference section is a perfect  example of scraping  the barrel.--Kudpung (talk) 04:30, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.