Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QK Southampton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:46, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

QK Southampton

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Looks like a non-notable local amateur soccer team. Does not appear to have played professionally or at the highest amateur level of the sport, as per WP:ATHLETE -- Boing!   said Zebedee  08:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:27, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:ATHLETE refers to individual players, not clubs. Having said that, the article was already deleted once before, per Articles for deletion/Q.K. Southampton F.C., and nothing significant has changed in the team's circumstances since then...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:27, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It was the only thing I could find relating to notability of sports things, so I assumed it applied too - do you know of anything relating to teams/clubs? -- Boing!   said Zebedee  11:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * General rule of thumb at the footy project for English clubs is that a team must have played in, or at the very least be in a league whose members are eligible to enter, the FA Cup..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks -- Boing!   said Zebedee  13:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Delete - this club has never played at a high enough level. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 13:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - They play too far down the English football pyramid to be considered notable. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  13:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Football Club History Database confirms they (or their predecessors) haven't played in the FA Cup or at a high enough league level. Also, there's no indication they pass general notability guidelines.  Bettia  (talk)  14:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonnotable amateur team. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.