Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QT's Diary (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:03, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

QT's Diary
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It's questionable whether this blog meets our notability criteria. There are a couple of sources cited at the end of the article, plus this, but I'm not sure this is enough. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * delete, seems to be fancruft and not notable, and completely unsourced. Artem.G (talk) 20:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't believe the 2006 nom was kept; the article was created a year after the blog was taken down, no real sources were ever added, and it never met N.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:08, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete- it only has two references here *neither* actually have anything to do with the content. Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.