Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QUOTE programming language


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

QUOTE programming language
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - a joke, according to the article; the single reference is unavailable, and the name is impossible to search for. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 23:53, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not even Turing-complete! -- Gwern (contribs) 20:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Turing-(in)completeness should absolutly not be a criteria for deciding wheter or not to include an esoteric programming language. —Ruud 21:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per my rationale at Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages. —Ruud 21:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Ruud. Equendil Talk 00:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.