Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qaineit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Den (Pharaoh). Tone 11:44, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Qaineit

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

So far as I can discover, all we know is that her name was on a stela and she may have been Den's wife, and she was not buried with him but nearby. See. I don't think one mention on a stela is sufficient for an article. I've searched for other information to no avail except to find a mention of a Qainneith 'known from a seal of unknown provenance' so possibly a different person Dougweller (talk) 19:50, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Queen of Egypt sounds pretty notable. Despite having only one known contemporaneous source, she is mentioned in subsequent sources. --Bejnar (talk) 01:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Question Where do you find evidence that she was a Queen? It's uncertain that she was Den's wife, and coupled with the possibility that she was a wife but not queen... Dougweller (talk) 08:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete/Redirect to Den_(Pharaoh), while Bejnar makes a good point about a queen meeting WP:N, I found no G book hits.  C T J F 8 3  chat 07:09, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes, if she wasn't Den's wife, that means that she wasn't a queen. But I think that is the best thing to do that we redirect this article to Den_(Pharaoh).--Mychele Trempetich (talk) 11:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Den, more than notability, there just doesn't seem to be much that can be said about her. It can easily be broken back out if sources appear. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  00:31, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * redirect and merge verifiable info. Mukadderat (talk) 16:20, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.