Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qamar Ali Abbasi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Qamar Ali Abbasi

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject to sufficiently establish notability. Search included his name in Arabic, "قمر علي عباسي" which yielded a few columns that he has written, but nothing written about him. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or pass WP:AUTHOR. J04n(talk page) 17:34, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 17:34, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 17:34, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Qamar Ali Abbasi is the perhaps the most important travelogue writer who writes in Urdu. The award from from APNS given to him in 1991 is very prestigious in Pakistan. The article needs substantial sources added and wikified. Add to the todo list? scope_creep (talk) 21:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Prove it. --Shirt58 (talk) 08:11, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I added every reference I could find in English (which happened to be one) and added a short bibliography. At the moment it's still not enough for me to change my vote to keep but I hope someone else can build on that and get a few more in there. At the moment the gentleman fails WP:GNG. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:29, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - the Dawn reference is a passing mention. Existence does not equal notability; not a notable person.--Shirt58 (talk) 08:11, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.