Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qamosona (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:59, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Qamosona
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Previous AFD closed as no consensus due to lack of comment. I don't see enough coverage in reliable sources to warrant an article.  Jujutacular  talk 23:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, as I said in the last one. A link to this site in the External links section of Pashto language is sufficient; the site in itself is not notable enough for an article. —Angr (talk) 23:46, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  --  Jujutacular  talk 23:50, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge the external link to Pashto per Angr (without redirect) and delete this page. There are no reliable sources and no clear notability. It doesn't seem necessary to treat the dictionary separately from the language it describes. Cnilep (talk) 01:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:WEB. -Drdisque (talk) 05:46, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.