Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qantas Flight Numbers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Merge into Qantas--Kungfu Adam (talk) 20:16, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Qantas Flight Numbers
This is like the Singapore Airlines flight numbers article, which was mostly deleted, and a summary was added to the mainline article. There is no reason for a separate article on this (WP:NOT) Dbinder 15:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Delete Voting delete as the nominator. Dbinder 15:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --Ter e nce Ong 16:24, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Scott Davis Talk 23:17, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * weak keep in the same way we have route information for rail and tram companies. Route information varies much less often than schedule/time information, therefore has a much lower maintenance burden. --Scott Davis Talk 23:17, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Is this really necessary? This list belongs on an airplane fansite, not an encyclopedia. Buchanan-H  e  rmit™ .. SCREAM!!! ..[[Image:Flag of British Columbia.svg|24px]]..[[Image:Maple Leaf.svg|14px]] 00:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I really can't see how this is needed in an encyclopaedia, online or not.  --Roisterer 07:59, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Listcruft. Zaxem 11:54, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with QANTAS. This doesn't need it's own page. (JROBBO 12:15, 7 May 2006 (UTC))
 * Delete or Merge Redundant duplicated information which includes the flight numbers. No need for its own page. --Arnzy (Talk) 13:19, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per JROBBO. If that is not possible, just delete it. -- ReyBrujo 20:51, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Useful info for someone I'm sure -- I@n &equiv; talk 23:58, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.