Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qbeta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Would be nice if the article was expanded a bit - Italian version has more than enough information. Tone 00:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Qbeta

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Only part English. iBendiscuss 05:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment Cut a man a little slack here. I'm doing the best I can to inter-link language wikis, and so I created the category Category:Sicilian musical groups, which has categories in it.wiki and scn.wiki.  I've posted a request at WP:ITALY and WP:SICILY to translate more notable articles over from those language wikis.  But in the meantime it's hard for a non-Italian/Sicilian speaker to fill up a clearly identifiable gap in language inter-wikis.  It's inarguable that there must be Sicilian musical groups of note, and it'll just take some time to populate the category.  In the meantime, this is no worse (and likely far better than) thousands of band articles of lesser note. MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep There is some independent coverage about this band. I added external links possibly useful for the expansion of the article:


 * Qbeta in concert in Piazza Garibaldi (GuignoPisano.com)
 * Ognittanto i Qbeta a Catania (Step1)
 * Qbeta (Sound Magazine)
 * Qbeta: esce il singolo Faccio festa (saltinaria.it)Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:34, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I don't understand the nomination rationale. "Only part English" should not be a reason for deletion, in my opinion. --Vejvančický (talk) 07:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SNOW. The rationale to delete no longer applies, at the very least. I'd ask for a withdrawal but it's unlikely from this particular nominator.
 * Keep No case has been made for deletion and it is worth noting that the article on the Italian Wikipedia—which seems to have something of a deletionist culture—has been around, and being edited for almost a year. Ian Spackman (talk) 00:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Why was this even nominated? "Only part English" is certainly not a valid rationale.  fetch  comms  ☛ 18:29, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.