Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qbiss by trimo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 12:15, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Qbiss by trimo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A Prod, however, there are some sources which write in detail so this is worth a wider discussion. Neutral listing.  SilkTork  *YES! 20:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Neither source appears to be independent or reliable, thus fails GNG. Article is both short and overly specific, seems to be promoting a product. Jclemens (talk) 21:34, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is pure promo material (WP:SPAM). -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 20:56, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - strikes me as promotional, and I'm not finding significant 3rd party coverage.  Cocytus   [»talk«]  05:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.